zimbio
October 21st, 2008Report: #273636
August 1st, 2008
Report: J.G. WENTWORTH ,321 HENDERSON
RECEIVABLES
Category: Financial Services
J.G. WENTWORTH ,321 HENDERSON
RECEIVABLES JG WENTWORTH REALLY
SCREWED ME OVER AND OVER AND OVER!!!
BRYN MAWR Pennsylvania
J.G. WENTWORTH ,321 HENDERSON
RECEIVABLES
Phone: 866-386-3102
Fax:
40 MORRIS AVENUE
BRYN MAWR, Pennsylvania, 19010
U.S.A.
CAUTION!!! Please use caution if you MUST enter into a transaction with J.G. Wentworth! I would strongly recommend never doing business with this company, and please let me tell you why…
After watching their countless commercials on T.V., I had decided to call JG Wentworth to see how much they could offer me if I sold a few of my future annuity payments. They called several times every day for three months promising to have the deal closed in 4-6 weeks. They said that no other company could get the deal approved as they could and as quickly as they could.
I really needed the funds for a few things I had planned on doing, and now it was just a matter of signing with the company that gave the most competitive offer. I went back and forth a few times with a few different companies until JGW offered me an amount I could agree on. They told me that they were not making any money on the deal and were just about breaking even, maybe even losing money, but wanted the deal for market share purposes and wanted to knock off the smaller competitors.
My sales rep at JGW said that their company had enough money that they could lose money on a few deals in order to gain market share. And after a few months of hearing their sales pitches and promises, they reeled me in like a fish on a hook.
A soon as I signed with them and overnighted the contract, all the constant calls suddenly stopped. They never returned my phone calls or answered my questions. I had called a few times with questions and they never got back to me. My sales person was always ‘unavailable’ or ‘in a meeting.’ The 4-6 week timeframe was of course, another promise unkept. I waited over four months just for the first court date, and let me tell you why there were two court dates.
On the first court date, I woke up at the crack of dawn and waited hours, but JGW’s lawyer never showed up, or so I thought. What had actually happened? I never really knew. Something about the name of the insurance company needed to be written a different way or so JGW claimed. They never bothered to pick up the phone to tell me that the court date had been rescheduled and so I ended up wasting my time.
My sales representative claimed he knew nothing about it and not so much as apologized for the inconvenience I was subjected to. What ever happened to common courtesy and decency? Nonetheless, I waited another month for the actual court date, which went smoothly. The judge approved the deal and we received a court order, which I faxed to JGW right after the hearing, as requested, so that they could start the process of funding my account, or so I thought.
One of the managers at JGW confirmed that he had forwarded the copy of the court order to the legal department and they had faxed it to my insurance company. He told me to follow up on the funds on Tuesday. I then spoke to my sales rep who said that it could take up to 3 weeks or more until I receive my funds. What?! He had been telling me all this time that once we get a court order, I would have my funds within two business days. ‘It’s because of your insurance company; they need to review everything over again’ is what he says. Whatever. Lies and lies. Anyhow, I call on Tuesday and my sales rep transfers me to a manager, who tells me that they are no longer funding my deal and are cancelling, and did not so much as give me a solid reason as to why. They told me some more lies upon lies.
After conducting some research on my own, I have come to the conclusion that they decided to cancel after having me waste my time for almost six months, because they decided that they could make more money on another deal or was not making enough money on my deal. So much for their claims of only caring about the market share and not caring about whether they were making money on my deal. They offered me an amount that they could not live up to, dragged me along for several months, and then just cancelled without so much as an explanation.
There is more to the story, but it would be too long if I wrote about everything. I just wanted everyone to get a jist of the ordeal I was subjected to by J.G. Wentworth. Some may wonder why I didn’t cancel with them sooner. I guess I didn’t want to start the process all over again with a different company, since I had already been waiting for so long. I do not want someone else to make the same mistakes I did and I want to warn everyone out there who may be contemplating whether or not to conduct a transaction with JGW: If you like being enticed and then slapped around over and over again, then be my guest and go with them, but if not, go with a company that appreciates and values its customers.
IRATE with JGW
Atlanta, Georgia
U.S.A.
June 1st, 2008
Stand Up Comedian
Brenden Bowman lives the American dream, a couch, a 42” plasma tv, and pizza on speed dial. If it weren’t for the flashbacks before he could walk, he might not be on parole still.
You can find Brenden performing at the Improv in Los Angeles, The Ice House in Pasadena, The Comedy Store In Hollywood, and also frequenting comedy clubs from Sacramento to Boston.
Brenden Found his way onto the comedy stage after dabbling in animation and commercial voice over and found that was not the way to grow up to become a cartoon character. This was after Brenden was forced to leave radio due to a couple cease and desist orders, and the Mohawk incident at the country station.
To the displeasure of his roommate, the cat, Brenden has been fairly successful on the road. With a mild case of schizophrenia it makes lonely hotel rooms and long plane rides seem like a party.
Brenden Bowman
Mr. B
Lawsuit Advance
June 1st, 2008world travel
June 1st, 2008
BredenTravels Online Travel Agency
Brenden travels is you one stop shop for everything you could need for your vacation planning. book air hotel and rental cars all together and save yourself hundreds of dollars. we have exclusive tours internationally, along with last minute getaways that start at $250. BrendenTravels also offers Gift Baskets to wish those heading off on an adventure well wishes. BrendenTravels also offers a HoneyMoon Bridal Registry, allowing you and your wedding guests to give your and your love the dream honeymoon to remember.
Also part of the YTB Network, learn to Travel Like Pro, and vacation for a living by becoming a travel agent.
BrendenTravels
Ask a Travel Agent
Personal Injury
March 21st, 2008Pre-Settlement Lawsuit Funding in Personal Injury Cases
By Aaron Larson
Law Offices of Aaron Larson
July, 2003
Contents
- Overview
- How Pre-Settlement Lawsuit Funding Works
- When Is Pre-Settlement Funding Appropriate?
- Ethical Issues
- Legal Issues
- Conclusion
Overview
Pre-settlement lawsuit funding usually comes in the form of non-recourse cash advances, provided to the injured person in return for a promise to repay the advance after the lawsuit settles or a victory in court. As this is “non-recourse” funding, an injured person does not have to repay the advance if they are unsuccessful in the lawsuit, and only has to repay up to the amount of their share of the settlement in the event that the settlement is smaller than anticipated. Due to the risk involved in issuing a non-recourse funding, the fees associated with pre-settlement funding can be significant. There are legal, ethical, and practical issues which should be taken into consideration, if you are considering applying for pre-settlement funding.
How Pre-Settlement Lawsuit Funding Works
An injured person contacts a company that offers pre-settlement lawsuit funding, sometimes at the suggestion of an attorney. The finance company contacts the lawyer who is handling the case, and obtains information about the case. Based upon that information provided, the loan company estimates the value of the likely eventual settlement or verdict, and offers a cash advance to the injured person based upon that estimate. The fee may be a flat fee, or a monthly fee that accrues each month the loan is outstanding. When the case settles, or the defendant pays after losing in court, the loan and associated fees are paid to the finance company.
These advances are offered as non-recourse funding, which means that an injured person has no obligation to repay if the lawsuit is lost. Similarly, if the ultimate settlement or verdict is smaller than anticipated, the amount that must be repaid never exceeds the amount of the injured person’s share of that verdict or settlement. For legal reasons, these advances are not characterized as loans.
Amounts available vary significantly, depending upon the nature of the case and the company involved. Many companies offer pre-settlement funding amounts between $500 and $25,000. A few offer amounts up to $100,000. Fees also vary depending upon the company and the type of case. Some companies will fix the fee for the advance up front. Others will charge a monthly fee for each month between the time the funding is issued and when it is repaid, sometimes as high as 15% per month.
When Is Pre-Settlement Funding Appropriate?
Litigation can take a very long time. Sometimes, cases drag on for years. While cases are pending, even where an injured person’s attorney is paying all of the legal expenses associated with the litigation, the injured person has to have enough money to get by. If the injured person is unable to work, has reduced income, or has expenses associated with care or disability, it may not be possible to wait until the end of the lawsuit before obtaining funds.
Given the fees involved in pre-settlement funding, it is important for injured people to consider any available alternatives. This type of financing should ordinarily be the last resort. The fees are premised upon the risk to the lender associated with non-recourse lending, but keep in mind that these companies choose their cases carefully in order to minimize risks, and if they offer you an advance they believe that you will receive money from your lawsuit. If you decide to obtain pre-settlement funding you should check with several companies, in order to obtain the most favorable terms.
Ethical Issues
A question that perhaps seems obvious is, why can’t injured people simply borrow money from their lawyers? The answer is that state bar associations recognize that when a lawyer becomes a creditor to a client, a conflict of interest is created that may interfere with the attorney-client relationship.
Sometimes an attorney won’t want to sign any contract with a settlement financing company, and some states prohibit lawyers from signing onto liens of the type necessary to secure this type of funding. As a result, typically companies require that the injured person sign the contract, and that the attorney sign an acknowledgement of the client’s instruction that the loan and associated fees be repaid from any eventual verdict or settlement.
At least one state (Florida) prohibits lawyers from participating in the settlement funding company’s evalaution process. Absent lawyer invovlement, it is unlikely that a finance company would be able to obtain enough information about a case to risk issuing non-recourse funding.
Legal Issues
In order to avoid usury laws (laws against charging excessive rates of interest), the funds you receive from a pre-settlement funding company will not be described as a “loan”. For example, the advance might be described as a “cash advance”, ‘investment”, or as “venture capital”. Technically, as the contract is not to repay the amount received but is instead a promise to pay a portion of any eventual verdict or settlement (which may never occur), these amounts are not loans. No matter what happens, a person who receives pre-settlement funding keeps the full amount of the advance.
A Michigan court recently held invalid a lawsuit funding contract where the defendant’s liability had been established, holding that as the plaintiff was certain to recover some amount of money the funding company’s advance was no longer contingent, and thus that the plaintiff only had to repay the principal (without interest) under Michigan’s usury laws. While other states may draw different conclusions from similar facts, it remains necessary that the amount be in some manner contingent - otherwise, it is a high interest loan.
An Ohio court similarly discharged a plaintiff’s obligation under a lawsuit funding contract on the basis of a common law doctrine called “champertry” - a prohibition against the sale of a party’s interest in a lawsuit. The court’s rationale was that lawsuit funding company sought to profit from the injured woman’s case, that lawsuit funding could create a disincentive to settle a case, where the plaintiff would have to pay the entire amount of the settlement to the finance company. A response to the first argument is that if it is acceptable for an attorney to profit from an injured person’s case, why should it not be permissible for a finance company? A response to the second argument is that had the woman not received the funding, she may have been forced to settle the case for far less than its value.
Another concern might be that lawsuit funding might encourage plaintiffs to file frivolous lawsuits. This, however, does not consider the fact that lawsuit funding companies want to be repaid, and thus aren’t likely to offer funds to plaintiffs who don’t have strong cases justifying substantial awards. Similarly, it will often be in the strongest cases that a plaintiff is most in need of money before the conclusion of a lawsuit, and the absence of sources of funding can force premature and inadequate settlements.
Conclusion
Pre-settlement lawsuit funding should be considered as a last resort, after all other funding options are exhausted. Due to the high cost of this type of funding, any decision to accept an advance should be made very carefully. When seeking pre-settlement funding, it makes sense to check with several companies, to obtain the lowest possible fees.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Aaron Larson. All rights reserved. No portion of this article may be reproduced without the express written permission of the copyright holder, except as follows: You may link this article to your website, either directly or through an ExpertLaw Library index page, provided your link does not depict this article, its author, or expertlaw.com in a negative manner.
- Home
- Expert Witness Directory
- Litigation Support
- Private Investigators
- Law Articles
- Law Forums
- Research Links
- About Us
- Injury Law Articles
- Assault and Battery
- Automobile Accidents
- Car Accident Litigation
- Catastrophic Personal Injury
- Defamation: Libel and Slander
- Dog Bite Injury Prevention
- Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer
- Lawsuit Funding Options
- Litigation Funding Options
- Negligence and Tort Law
- Personal Injury
- Premises Liability Articles
- Pre-Settlement Lawsuit Funding
- Principals, Agents, and Liability
- The Lawsuit Loan
- The Structured Settlement
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Product Liability Articles
- Lawsuit Financing Companies
- Statute of Limitations by State
- Wrongful Death Litigation
- Malpractice Law Articles
- Personal Injury Forums
- Attorneys-USA
Personal Injury
March 21st, 2008Personal injury
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A personal injury occurs when a person has suffered some form of injury, either physical or psychological, as the result of an accident or medical malpractice.
The most common type of personal injury claims are road traffic accidents, accidents at work, tripping accidents, assault claims, accidents in the home, defective product accidents and holiday accidents. Indeed, there are a multitude of types of accident and the term personal injury also incorporates medical and dental accidents (which lead to numerous medical and dental negligence claims every year) and conditions which are often classified as industrial disease cases. Industrial disease type cases include asbestosis and mesothelioma, chest diseases (e.g. emphysema, pneumoconiosis, silicosis, chronic bronchitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic obstructive airways disease), vibration white finger, occupational deafness, occupational stress, contact dermititus, and repetitive strain injury cases.
Where the accident was the fault of someone else, the injured party may be entitled to monetary compensation from the person whose negligent conduct caused the injury. At least in the United States this system is complex and controversial with critics calling for various forms of tort reform. Attorneys often represent clients on a “contigency basis,” in which the attorney does not charge for services until the case is resolved.
In England and Wales, under the limitation rules, where an individual is bringing a claim for compensation, court proceedings must be commenced within 3 years of the date of the accident, failing which the claimant will lose the right to bring their claim. However, if the injured party was under the age of 18 at the time of the accident, then they have up until the day prior to their 21st birthday to commence proceedings. Legal Aid for personal injury cases was largely abolished in the late 1990s and replaced with “no win, no fee” arrangements.
Structured Settlements in Personal Injury Cases
Often, the use of a Structured Settlement is desired by the injury victim to help protect them financially after an injury settlement.[citation needed]
Structured Settlements provide injury victims with tax benefits and enable proper financial planning for future needs of the injury victim as a result of the injury
Concerning the establishment of a “Structured Settlement Protection Act”.
March 21st, 2008
CHAPTER 164
_______________
COURTS
_______________
SENATE BILL 04-098 [Digest]
BY SENATOR(S) Hanna, Groff, and Tapia;
also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Stengel, Boyd, Hoppe, Larson, and Weddig.
AN ACT
Concerning the establishment of a “Structured Settlement Protection Act”.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
SECTION 1. Title 13, Colorado Revised Statutes, is amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW ARTICLE to read:
ARTICLE 23
Structured Settlement Protection Act
13-23-101. Short title. This article shall be known and may be cited as the “Structured Settlement Protection Act”.
13-23-102. Definitions. As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) “Annuity issuer” means an insurer that has issued a contract to fund periodic payments under a structured settlement.
(2) “Dependent” means a payee’s spouse, minor child, or any person for whom the payee is legally obligated to provide support, including maintenance.
(3) “Discounted present value” means the present value of future payments determined by discounting such payments to the present using the most recently published applicable federal rate for determining the present value of an annuity, as issued by the United States internal revenue service.
(4) “Gross advance amount” means the sum payable to the payee or for the payee’s account as consideration for a transfer of structured settlement payment rights before any reductions for transfer expenses or other deductions are made from such consideration.
(5) “Independent professional advice” means advice of an attorney, certified public accountant, actuary, or other licensed professional adviser.
(6) “Interested parties” means the payee, any beneficiary irrevocably designated under the annuity contract to receive payments following the payee’s death, the annuity issuer, the structured settlement obligor, and any other party who has continuing rights or obligations under such structured settlement. If a delegate child support enforcement unit is enforcing a payee’s legal obligation to support his or her dependent children, pursuant to section 26-13-105, C.R.S., “interested parties” shall also include the delegate child support enforcement unit.
(7) “Net advance amount” means the gross advance amount less the aggregate amount of the actual and estimated transfer expenses required to be disclosed under section 13-23-103.
(8) “Payee” means an individual who is receiving tax-free payments under a structured settlement and who proposes to make a transfer of payment rights thereunder.
(9) “Periodic payment” means a recurring payment or a scheduled future lump sum payment.
(10) “Qualified assignment agreement” means an agreement providing for a qualified assignment within the meaning of section 130 of the federal “Internal Revenue Code of 1986″, as amended.
(11) “Responsible administrative authority” means any government authority vested by law with exclusive jurisdiction over the settled claim resolved by such structured settlement.
(12) “Settled claim” means the original tort claim resolved by a structured settlement.
(13) “Structured settlement” means an arrangement for periodic payment of damages for personal injuries or sickness established by settlement or judgment in resolution of a tort claim.
(14) “Structured settlement agreement” means the agreement, judgment, stipulation, or release embodying the terms of a structured settlement.
(15) “Structured settlement obligor” means the party who has the continuing obligation to make periodic payments to the payee under a structured settlement agreement or a qualified assignment agreement.
(16) “Structured settlement payment right” means the right to receive periodic payments under a structured settlement, whether from the structured settlement obligor or the annuity issuer, where:
(a) The payee is domiciled in Colorado, or the domicile or principal place of business of the structured settlement obligor or the annuity issuer is Colorado; or
(b) The structured settlement agreement was approved by a court or responsible administrative authority in Colorado; or
(c) The structured settlement agreement is expressly governed by the laws of Colorado.
(17) “Terms of the structured settlement” means the terms of the structured settlement agreement, the annuity contract, a qualified assignment agreement, and any order or other approval of a court or responsible administrative authority or other government authority that authorized or approved such structured settlement.
(18) “Transfer” means a sale, assignment, pledge, hypothecation, or other alienation or encumbrance of a structured settlement payment right made by a payee for consideration; except that the term “transfer” does not include the creation or perfection of a security interest in a structured settlement payment right under a blanket security agreement entered into with an insured depository institution, in the absence of any action to redirect the structured settlement payments to such insured depository institution, or an agent or successor in interest thereof, or otherwise to enforce such blanket security interest against the structured settlement payment rights.
(19) “Transfer agreement” means the agreement providing for a transfer of a structured settlement payment right.
(20) “Transferee” means a party acquiring or proposing to acquire a structured settlement payment right through a transfer.
(21) “Transfer expenses” means all expenses of a transfer that are required under the transfer agreement to be paid by the payee or deducted from the gross advance amount, including, without limitation, court filing fees, attorney fees, escrow fees, lien recordation fees, judgment and lien search fees, finders’ fees, commissions, and other payments to a broker or other intermediary. “Transfer expenses” does not include preexisting obligations of the payee payable for the payee’s account from the proceeds of a transfer.
13-23-103. Required disclosures to payee. (1) Not fewer than three days prior to the date on which a payee signs a transfer agreement, the transferee shall provide to the payee a separate disclosure statement, in bold type no smaller than fourteen points, setting forth:
(a) The amounts and due dates of the structured settlement payments to be transferred;
(b) The aggregate amount of such payments;
(c) The discounted present value of the payments to be transferred, which shall be identified as the “calculation of current value of the transferred structured settlement payments under federal standards for valuing annuities”, and the amount of the applicable federal rate used in calculating such discounted present value;
(d) The gross advance amount;
(e) An itemized listing of all applicable transfer expenses, other than attorney fees and related disbursements, payable in connection with the transferee’s application for approval of the transfer, and the transferee’s best estimate of the amount of any attorney fees and related disbursements;
(f) The net advance amount;
(g) The amount of any penalties or liquidated damages payable by the payee in the event of a breach of the transfer agreement by the payee; and
(h) A statement that the payee has the right to cancel the transfer agreement, without penalty or further obligation, not later than the third business day after the date the agreement is signed by the payee.
13-23-104. Approval of transfers of structured settlement payment rights. (1) A direct or indirect transfer of a structured settlement payment right shall not be effective and a structured settlement obligor or annuity issuer shall not be required to make a payment directly or indirectly to a transferee of a structured settlement payment right unless the transfer has been approved in advance in a final court order or order of a responsible administrative authority based on express findings by such court or responsible administrative authority that:
(a) The transfer is in the best interests of the payee, taking into account the welfare and support of the payee’s dependents;
(b) The payee has been advised in writing by the transferee to seek independent professional advice regarding the transfer and has either received such advice or knowingly and willingly waived such advice in writing; and
(c) The transfer does not contravene any applicable statute or the order of any court or other government authority.
13-23-105. Effect of transfer of structured settlement payment right. (1) Following a transfer of a structured settlement payment right pursuant to this article:
(a) The structured settlement obligor and the annuity issuer shall, as to all parties except the transferee, be discharged and released from all liability for the transferred payments;
(b) The transferee shall be liable to the structured settlement obligor and the annuity issuer:
(I) If the transfer contravenes the terms of the structured settlement, for any taxes incurred by such parties as a consequence of the transfer; and
(II) For any other liabilities or costs, including reasonable costs and attorney fees, arising from compliance by such parties with the order of the court or responsible administrative authority or arising as a consequence of the transferee’s failure to comply with the provisions of this article;
(c) Neither the annuity issuer nor the structured settlement obligor may be required to divide any periodic payment between the payee and a transferee or assignee or between two or more transferees or assignees; and
(d) Any further transfer of structured settlement payment rights by the payee may be made only after compliance with all of the requirements of this article.
13-23-106. Procedure for approval of transfer. (1) An application under this article for approval of a transfer of a structured settlement payment right shall be made by the transferee and may be brought:
(a) In the district court for the county in which the payee resides;
(b) In the district court for the county in which the structured settlement obligor or the annuity issuer maintains its principal place of business; or
(c) In any court or before any responsible administrative authority that approved the structured settlement agreement.
(2) Not fewer than twenty days prior to the scheduled hearing on an application for approval of a transfer of structured settlement payment rights under section 13-23-104, the transferee shall file with the court or responsible administrative authority and serve on all interested parties a notice of the proposed transfer and the application for its authorization. The transferee shall file and serve:
(a) A copy of the transferee’s application;
(b) A copy of the transfer agreement;
(c) A copy of the disclosure statement required pursuant to section 13-23-103;
(d) A listing of each of the payee’s dependents, together with each dependent’s age;
(e) A notification that any interested party is entitled to support, oppose, or otherwise respond to the transferee’s application, either in person or by counsel, by submitting written comments to the court or responsible administrative authority or by participating in the hearing; and
(f) A notification of the time and place of the hearing and notification of the manner in which and the time by which written responses to the application must be filed, which shall be not fewer than fifteen days after service of the transferee’s notice, in order to be considered by the court or responsible administrative authority.
13-23-107. General provisions - construction. (1) The provisions of this article may not be waived by any payee.
(2) Any transfer agreement entered into on or after July 1, 2004, by a payee who resides in Colorado shall provide that disputes under such transfer agreement, including any claim that the payee has breached the agreement, shall be determined in and under the laws of Colorado. No such transfer agreement shall authorize the transferee or any other party to confess judgment or consent to entry of judgment against the payee.
(3) A transfer of structured settlement payment rights shall not extend to any payments that are life-contingent unless, prior to the date on which the payee signs the transfer agreement, the transferee has established and has agreed to maintain procedures reasonably satisfactory to the annuity issuer and the structured settlement obligor for periodically confirming the payee’s survival and giving the annuity issuer and the structured settlement obligor prompt written notice in the event of the payee’s death.
(4) A payee who proposes to make a transfer of a structured settlement payment right shall not incur any penalty, forfeit any application fee or other payment, or otherwise incur any liability to the proposed transferee or any assignee based on a failure of such transfer to satisfy the conditions of this article.
(5) Nothing contained in this article shall be construed to authorize a transfer of a structured settlement payment right in contravention of any law or to imply that a transfer under a transfer agreement entered into prior to July 1, 2004, is valid or invalid.
(6) Compliance with the requirements set forth in section 13-23-103 and fulfillment of the conditions set forth in section 13-23-104 shall be solely the responsibility of the transferee in a transfer of structured settlement payment rights, and neither the structured settlement obligor nor the annuity issuer shall bear responsibility for, or any liability arising from, non-compliance with such requirements or failure to fulfill such conditions.
13-23-108. Exceptions - judgment for periodic payment against a health care professional or institution - assignment of workers’ compensation benefits. Nothing in this article shall apply to a judgment entered pursuant to the provisions of part 2 of article 64 of this title or to compensation or benefits due under articles 40 to 47 of title 8, C.R.S.
SECTION 2. Effective date - applicability. This act shall take effect July 1, 2004, and shall apply to agreements to transfer a structured settlement payment right executed on or after said date.
SECTION 3. Safety clause. The general assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety.
Approved: April 20, 2004
———-
Capital letters indicate new material added to existing statutes; dashes through words indicate deletions from existing statutes and such material not part of act.
tech stuff
March 19th, 2008Hello world!
March 17th, 2008Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!
